In the Essay “Civil
Disobedience” Thoreau appears as a social rebel and a critic of American
government and society of his time. ‘Civil Disobedience’ established his
reputation in the wider political world. Thoreau’s
political theories were not well known during his own time. They were usually
presented as lectures to small audiences or as articles. In 1849, Civil Disobedience was published under the title “Resistance to Civil Government”. It is
one of the most influential political tracts ever written by an American.
This essay mainly deals with the
relation between the citizen and the state. It also tells about the
nature of the Government, state and the individual. The essay opens with a
paradoxical view. According to Thoreau ‘That
government is best which governs the least’. That means Thoreau is in
famous of the absolute freedom of the individual citizen of a state. This
absolute freedom should be the basis of an ideal from of democracy. Then the
government will not interfere with the activities of the citizens as long as
those activities will not clash with the interest of the members of the society.
According to Thoreau, the government of
his day did not come close to this ideal for two basic reasons: slavery and the Mexican-American war. It is important to remember that,
although Thoreau’s imprisonment was a protest against slavery, Civil Disobedience
was written after the outbreak of the Mexican- American war and protests both
slavery and war.
Civil Disobedience is an analysis of
the individual’s relationship to the state that focuses on why men obey
governmental law even when they believed it to be unjust. But Civil
Disobedience is not an essay of abstract theory. It is Thoreau’s extremely personal response to being imprisoned for
breaking the law. He was arrested for not paying the taxes. One of his aunts
paid the taxes and he was released from the jail the next morning. This one
nights experience led him to write his most famous essay on “Civil
Disobedience”.
According to Thoreau, conscience should be the guiding force
of government or law. He gives the highest importance to conscience and the
least importance to the majority. His whole concept of civil disobedience is
based on the dictates of conscience. The human beings possess this conscience,
not the animals. Since a state consists of human beings, the conscience should
be the guiding force, not majority. Thoreau
thinks that the majority in a so-called
democratic state is permitted to rule for long, not because they are most
likely to be in the right, but because they are physically the strongest.
Thoreau says that conscience makes an individual strong and self-reliant. This
God gifted conscience should decide what is just and what unjust, not brute
majority. That is why a man is a man first and secondly a citizen of state.
Thoreau further says that the masses of men serve the state, not mainly
as men, but as machines. They all constitute the army, police, militia, jailors
etc. we see soldiers marching to wars, against their will and conscience. They
do not exercise judgment or moral sense. Yet they are regarded as good
citizens. But those who serve the state with conscience are commonly treated as
enemies.
Thus, Thoreau has considered the
relation between the state and the individual at different levels, and has
convincingly shown that individual, and individual conscience should be the
basis of a good state.
Helpful post.
ReplyDelete